MUST READ FOR REPUBLICAN STATE REPRESENTATIVES Political Correctness Is The Marxists’ Attempt to Stifle Your Freedom of Speech Many Republican Legislators Have Silently Submitted
May 12, 2017
Steven F. Hotze, M.D.
Publisher, CRTX News
It is imperative that you understand the underlying Marxist, communist philosophy of Democrats and left leaning RINOs and its radical tactic employed to attack free speech, especially that of Christians and conservatives.
Karl Marx was an atheist who wrote, in 1867, “Das Kapital” which was the philosophical basis of communism and socialism. Those that follow this atheistic philosophy are known as Marxists, communists and socialists.
Freedom of Speech Is a U.S. Constitutional Entitlement: The United States Constitution is the law of the land. Included within it is the First Amendment that guarantees the right of freedom of speech. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;…” The Courts and Congress are strictly forbidden from abridging free speech through rulings or through legislation. This important right has traditionally been broadly construed by Federal courts.
However, the Constitution became a total farce during Obama’s lawless reign where the acceptable culture was to blatantly trash it as a matter of course for political and judicial expediency without consequences. The ramifications of Obama’s appalling culture catalyzed a toxic, anti-American precedent that continues to poison the fabric of our country today.
Attacking Free Speech: Notwithstanding 8 years of Obama and his ilk of anti-US Marxists eroding freedom of speech, the following are recent, thought provoking examples that occurred at the University of California at Berkeley.
- On February 1, 2017, UC Berkeley cancelled a speech to be given the following evening by outspoken Trump supporter Milo Yiannopoulos. Berkeley’s administration claimed the last-minute cancellation was due to violence, massive destruction and damage caused the previous evening by professionally organized thugs rioting under the absurd guise of ‘protesting Trump.’ The University estimated the damages to the campus $100K and counting.
- In April, UC Berkeley cancelled a scheduled speech by a noted conservative, Ann Coulter. The lame excuse was the inability to provide adequate security after receiving active threats of more violence and destruction if the event proceeded.
Intentionally shutting down Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter speaks volumes about Berkeley’s brass as well as the hypocritical institution’s legacy and reputation as a bastion of free speech. Ironically, during the 60’s counter culture revolution UC Berkeley was among the most outspoken institutions to demand free speech. Things certainly do change.
Silencing the Opposition: The tactic being used to attack people with opposing views is deeply rooted in Cultural Marxism. This ideology was conceived, circa 1921, at the Frankfurt School in Frankfurt, Germany by a group of radical Marxist intellectuals who rejected and ultimately replaced Karl Marx’s traditional Economic Marxism. Cultural Marxism is modern day Marxism; the ideology underlying the Communist political system.
The founding Cultural Marxists envisioned the complete annihilation of Western traditions, values, and cultures by catalyzing a lengthy, indefensible, peaceful cultural revolution wherein traditional morals and authority would be rejected. They proposed that once their goal was achieved traditional Western cultures and values would be supplanted by Cultural Marxist ideology.
The Cultural Marxists developed political correctness, hereinafter referred to as PC, as a significant component in achieving their goal.
The Dominance of Political Correctness: PC dominates and has dramatically transformed traditional American culture and values. The term is tossed about and most people know it denotes a word, term, symbol, act, look, etc., that is acceptable to a group that unilaterally deems it as such. Realistically, however, very few people know or care about its origin, true meaning, and purpose, so I will enlighten those who are interested with some salient facts.
Political Correctness: The term, PC, appears to be innocuous; however, that is not the case. PC is a radical social movement underpinned by an evil, anti-Western hateful ideology designed to divide and conquer by using man’s natural divisions, e.g., color, race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation to foment, nurture and magnify strife between the various groups.
Political Correctness is Marxism: PC is also a deceptive term for progressivism and multiculturalism; both of which are verbal substitutes for Marxism, cleverly used to conceal the true ideology. Therefore PC is Marxism. Inherent in it are loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional values and social order, and ultimately, a totalitarian state enforcing radical egalitarianism.
Tactical Political Correctness: PC is a devious Marxist psychological command and control tactic used to force mass compliance with uniformity in the desired thought, speech, and behavior. This is achieved by emphatically stating that for one not to be considered a racist, sexist, fascist, bigot, homophobe, Islamaphobe, etc., they must be nonjudgmental and unequivocally accept certain moral absolutes of progressives. Included therein are inclusion, diversity, tolerance, social and economic justice, sensitivity, and sexual orientation.
Violating Political Correctness: Regardless of the situation involving PC, its application and consequences for non-compliance are the same. The perceived violator of PC is relentlessly and unmercifully demonized with ad hominem attacks and often physically battered to the point of capitulation through submission, acquiescence, or tacit acceptance by silence.
We have seen this tacit acceptance of PC with a majority of Texas Republican state representatives.
The intensity of PC tactics was dramatically increased during Obama’s reign to focus on creating the same systemic disruption and chaos he utilized as a radical activist community organizer. Professionally organized and well-funded riots that included violence, property destruction and attempts to kill law enforcement officers became the norm… and generally without meaningful consequences to the participants. Black Lives Matter were among Obama’s ‘sacred cows’ and operated with virtual impunity.
U.C. Berkeley: It should be abundantly clear that this scenario was orchestrated with success by professionally organized thugs to prevent Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter from speaking at U.C. Berkeley. During the chaos, violence and property destruction, compliant cops stood down at the direction of Berkeley’s radical activist anti-US mayor, Jesse Arreguin. The hate-filled crowd justified their behavior by blaming Milo for being a conservative supporting Trump. The student body considers free speech to be dangerous to them.
You probably recall this was the same disgusting tactic used at most of Trump’s campaign rallies by violent thugs and useful idiots masquerading as protesters claiming to oppose his views and plans. Today the vicious smear attacks and incessant lies by progressives, main stream media, Marxist Democrats, and other Trump haters have increased exponentially in the lawless culture created by Obama and his seditious associates.
Reluctance to Speak Freely in America: While Berkeley is an extreme, but certainly not exclusive example, this outrageous condition has instilled a reluctance to speak freely in far too many people, businesses, and institutions that legitimately fear being accused of politically incorrect behavior and suffering the harsh consequences. This is tantamount to stifling freedom of speech in violation of the First Amendment and must be courageously opposed.
CRTXNEWS. All rights reserved www.crtxnews.com